• Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 33-36

Etiological Trends in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Institutional Study


Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission07-Dec-2015
Date of Acceptance16-Mar-2016
Date of Web Publication29-Apr-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Varsha Salian
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Nitte University, Nityanand Nagar, Deralakatte, Mangalore 575018, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2395-3977.181429

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Aim: Oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) are among the most common cancers that affect human population worldwide. This study aims to analyze the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical and histopathological features, and metastasis in OSCC cases.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included the subjects reported to Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology in A B Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences between 2009 and 2013. Data on age, gender, tumor location, lymph node metastasis, associated risk factors, and histopathological grades were recorded and subjected to Pearson's Chi-square analysis for any correlation between habits and other variables.
Results: A total of 61 cases were included. Male: female ratio was 2.6:1 with maximum cases seen in the fifth and sixth decades of life. Totally, 59 cases reported tobacco chewing habit and 2 cases reported sharp teeth. Quid chewing was the most frequently reported habit and buccal mucosa was the common site. Most cases were well differentiated, associated with quid chewing and without nodal metastasis. The correlation of habits to other variables was statistically insignificant (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: In this study, betel quid chewing was the most important etiological agent of OSCC and was associated with the few cases of poorly differentiated OSCC.

Keywords: Betel quid, oral squamous cell carcinoma, tobacco


How to cite this article:
Salian V, Dinakar C, Shetty P, Ajila V. Etiological Trends in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Institutional Study. Cancer Transl Med 2016;2:33-6

How to cite this URL:
Salian V, Dinakar C, Shetty P, Ajila V. Etiological Trends in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Institutional Study. Cancer Transl Med [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 23];2:33-6. Available from: http://www.cancertm.com/text.asp?2016/2/2/33/181429


  Introduction Top


Oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas are the sixth most common cancers worldwide and represent about 90% of all oral malignancies. [1],[2] The incidence of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) varies in different parts of the world and this difference is largely attributed to the exposure to risk factors specific to the area. [3] In Southeast Asia, oral cancer is the second most frequent form of cancer and the second most frequent cause of death from cancer among males. One-third of global cases and one-half of deaths from oral cancer are reported from Southeast Asia. [4] In India, oral cancer ranks the first among male and the third among female population which is related to the use of tobacco chewing in the form of betel quid, tobacco smoking, reverse smoking as well as other factors such as alcohol consumption, low socioeconomic status, poor hygiene, poor diet and viral infections, ill-fitting dentures, and chronic irritation from rough or fractured teeth. [3] Persons exposed to smoking, drinking, and betel quid chewing together are at high risk compared to individuals exposed to any one of these factors. [4] The male: female ratio is 2:1 and the average age of diagnosis is 57.1 years in males and 52.5 in females with highest prevalence in the sixth decade of life. [5] In Southeast Asia, most cases of OSCC occur in the buccal and commissural areas of the oral cavity. [5]


  Methods Top


This retrospective cross-sectional study included 61 clinically diagnosed and histopathologically confirmed cases of OSCC from the Archives of the Department during the period of 2009-2013. Clinical data including age, gender, risk factors, presence of sharp tooth and appliances, tumor location, and histopathological grade with lymph node metastasis were recovered from patient archives.

Statistical analysis for the correlation between the variables, etiological factors of OSCC and age, gender, histopathological grade, and lymph node metastasis, was performed using Chi-square test.


  Results Top


A total of 61 cases (44 males and 17 females) were included in this study with an age range of 28-77 years and a mean age of 57 years. The age distribution of patients is summarized in [Table 1]. Majority of the cases were distributed between 40 and 70 years; 26% in the age group of 41-50 years, 30% in the age group of 51-60, and 31% in the age group of 61-70 years. The most common etiological agent was quid chewing (54%) followed by smoking (15%). The combination of habits documented (and the percentage distribution of a number of cases) was quid chewing and alcohol (12%), smoking and quid chewing (8%), smoking and alcohol (5%), and smoking, quid chewing, and alcohol (3%). The sharp tooth as an etiological factor was found in 3% of the cases. The common site of occurrence of OSCC was the buccal mucosa (34%) followed by alveolus (26%), tongue (20%), palate (8%), maxilla and lip (5% each), and floor of the mouth (2%).
Table 1: Age distribution, etiological factors, primary site, lymph node metastasis, and histopathological grade for 61 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma


Click here to view


The highest number of cases were well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (76%) followed by moderately differentiated (21%) and poorly differentiated (3%) [Figure 1]. Lymph node metastasis was seen in 20% of cases, majority of which were associated with the habit of quid chewing and 80% of the cases were not associated with any lymph node metastasis. There was no statistically significant correlation seen between etiological risk factors and any of the other variables including location, histopathological grade and lymph node metastasis. However, the poorly differentiated grade of OSCC was associated predominantly with betel quid chewing [Figure 1]. One of the two cases of poorly differentiated grade of OSCC aged < 30 years showed lymph node metastasis, whereas no recurrence was seen in both the cases. Histopathologically, one of the cases showed deeper invasion and muscle infiltration in the connective tissue, whereas none of them showed evidence of perineural invasion.
Figure 1. The association between different histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma with etiological risk factors. Poorly differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma was associated with betel quid chewing

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Oral cavity cancer is the 8 th most frequent cancer in the world among males and 14 th among females with the major risk factors being tobacco and alcohol consumption. [6] The incidence of oral cancer differs in different regions of the world varying from over 20/100,000 in India to 10/100,000 in the USA, and < 2/100,000 in the Middle East. [6] In the United States, 3% of cancers occur in the oral cavity, whereas in India it is 30%. This difference may be due to regional variations as well as variations in the risk factors. [6] According to Murthy and Mathew, [7] cancers of the oral cavity are highest in Kerala in South India. Oral cancer in India is a major public health problem. Persons residing in rural areas may not have access to healthcare services. Due to this, diagnosis is delayed, treatment outcomes are poor, and cost of treatment is high. [6] International Agency for Research on Cancer mentions that cancers of the oral cavity, lungs, esophagus, stomach, cervix, and breast are commonly occurring cancers in the Indian population. [6]

A total of 61 cases were enrolled in this study which included 44 males and 17 females. Thus, the male: female ratio is 2.6:1 with male preponderance. This is in accordance with the study by Sharma et al.,[2] who found a male: female ratio of 2.2:1 in a North Indian population. However, in a study conducted in a rural population of Andhra Pradesh, it was observed that females were affected more than males, but this was attributed to the habit of reverse smoking which is more common in the female population of Andhra Pradesh. [8] Franceschi et al. [9] found that in Bengaluru, India, the oral cancer incidence rate was higher in females than males.

The age range of the patients in our study was between 28 and 77 years with a mean age of 57 years. This is in accordance with Shenoi et al.[10] who reported that OSCC commonly occurs in the sixth decade of life. Oral cancers in younger individuals follow a more aggressive course and are associated with poor prognosis. [11],[12],[13] This was seen in our study as well as where a 28-year-old male patient with buccal mucosal cancer associated with quid chewing showed poorly differentiated OSCC and nodal metastasis.

The most common site of occurrence, in our study, was the buccal mucosa (34%) followed by alveolus (26%) and tongue (20%) which is the common site for oral cancers in countries where the use of quid chewing is common. This is probably because majority of the lesions correspond to the site of maximum exposure to betel quid and also to other related habits. [2] Shenoi et al.[10] in their analysis also found buccal mucosa to be the most common site followed by the alveolus as in our study. Thus, our results were in accordance with previous findings. In Iran, the most common sites include the ventrolateral tongue and floor of the mouth. [13] Al-Rawi and Talabani [14] found that in their study in Iraq, the lip was the common site of oral cancer. In a study of subjects under the age of 35 years, suffering from oral cancer, the tongue was the most common site followed by buccal mucosa, especially in cases without habits of tobacco and alcohol. [11]

The most common risk factor found from our study was quid chewing accounting for 54% of cases. This is in accordance with most studies in Southeast Asian countries where betel quid and areca nut quid are chewed by the female and male population alike and also due to the widespread use of products such as gutkha and pan masala. [4] Currently, premixed areca nut, lime, and condiments with or without powdered tobacco are being marketed as gutkha and pan masala which is placed in the cheek and chewed or sucked for a variable amount of time. [7] Quid, which is known as pan, consists of betel leaf, areca nut, tobacco, and lime. [15] Quid chewing is proved to be an independent risk factor for oral cancer. [16] The combination of lime and tobacco causes an exothermic reaction which increases the susceptibility of oral mucosa to carcinogens. [17]

The second most common risk factor was found to be bidi/cigarette smoking alone (15%), which was higher than the number of cases showing a combination of smoking and chewing habits (8%) and smoking and alcohol consumption (5%). Krishna Rao et al.[17] in their update on the epidemiology of oral cancer have mentioned that bidi smoking alone was at higher risk for oral cancer compared to its combination with quid chewing. Bidi smoking is common in South India than cigarette smoking. Bidi smokers have 3.1 times more risk of oral cancers compared to nonsmokers in South Asia which were seen in our study. [18]

The other combinations recorded were quid chewing and alcohol consumption (12%) and smoking, quid chewing, and alcohol consumption (3%). There were no cases reported with the history of alcohol consumption alone without other habits such as quid chewing or smoking which could be because alcohol consumption has a synergistic effect with quid chewing and smoking. Lin et al.[19] stated that alcohol was not a significant independent risk factor; however, it increased 40 times when combined with quid chewing and smoking.

Petti et al. [4] stated that in multiexposed individuals, oral cancer risk was 50 times higher than in unexposed individuals. Franceschi et al.[9] stated that increase in alcohol consumption leads to increased risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer even though the smoking level in a population remains nearly constant, which could be the reason why none of the cases in our study showed the habit of only alcohol consumption without other habits.

International head and neck cancer epidemiology and the alcohol-related cancers and genetic susceptibility in Europe studies reported that the smoking-drinking interaction was responsible for 40% of oral cancer cases. [4] The present study relatively showed a very small percentage of population falling into this category which could be because betel quid chewing was the most preferred way of tobacco consumption as compared to smoking and drinking.

The study conducted by Petti et al. [4] also reported that annually, 74.92% of oral cancer cases which occur in Southeast Asia are due to concurrent smoking, betel quid chewing, and alcohol consumption. [4] However, in our study, least number of subjects fell into this category. A possible explanation could be underreporting of habit history by patients.

The highest number of cases in our study were well-differentiated (76%) followed by moderately differentiated (21%) and poorly differentiated (3%). Lymph node metastasis was seen in 12 cases (20%). This is in accordance with previous literature which reports that the majority of OSCC patients present with well-differentiated carcinoma. [12],[14],[20] An interesting finding in our study was that the poorly differentiated grade of OSCC was mostly seen associated with betel quid chewing (66.7%). Betel quid is known to induce proliferation and differentiation of oral epithelial cells. [21] It has been associated with poorly differentiated tumors as well as tumors with increased invasive nature. [21] Src family kinases released from betel quid have been associated with cell migration and invasive potential of OSCC indicating a poor prognosis. [22] Fang et al.[21] evaluated the association between histological differentiation of OSCC and clinicopathologic manifestations, adverse events after treatment, and outcomes of patients in a region prevalent for betel quid chewing. He found that poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas showed a higher probability of developing neck recurrence and distant metastasis, but not local recurrence or a second primary tumor. Poorly differentiated OSCC has been associated with greater incidence of cervical lymph node metastasis and recurrence. [23] In our study, one case of poorly differentiated OSCC showed nodal metastasis at presentation. Both cases showed no evidence of recurrence after treatment. Few studies have also linked lymphatic and vascular invasion with locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis. [24] Our cases showed no evidence of lymphatic or vascular invasion although muscle infiltration was seen in one case with poorly differentiated OSCC.

In conclusion, the present study has summarized cases of OSCC reporting to our institution. The etiological factor for OSCC in our study was betel quid chewing which is a common practice among both males and females in South India. The buccal mucosa was the common site of oral cancer as in most other Indian studies. Most OSCC in our study were well differentiated followed by moderately differentiated type which is similar to previously published reports. Among the few OSCC which was poorly differentiated, majority were associated with the habit of betel quid chewing.

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge the postgraduates in the department, Dr. Shaloo Dahima and Dr. Manav Chaturvedi for extending their help and support in acquiring and tabulating data for the present study. I would also like to thank Dr. Srikant N for his help regarding statistical analysis for the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Warnakulasuriya S. Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009; 45 (4-5): 309-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sharma P, Saxena S, Aggarwal P. Trends in the epidemiology of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Western UP: an institutional study. Indian J Dent Res 2010; 21 (3): 316-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Aruna DS, Prasad KV, Shavi GR, Ariga J, Rajesh G, Krishna M. Retrospective study on risk habits among oral cancer patients in Karnataka Cancer Therapy and Research Institute, Hubli, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011; 12 (6): 1561-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Petti S, Masood M, Scully C. The magnitude of tobacco smoking-betel quid chewing-alcohol drinking interaction effect on oral cancer in South-East Asia. A meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2013; 8 (11): e78999.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mathur PT, Dayal PK, Pai K. Correlation of clinical patterns of oral squamous cell carcinoma with age, site, sex and habits. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2011; 23 (2): 81-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Coelho KR. Challenges of the oral cancer burden in India. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 2012: 701932.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Murthy NS, Mathew A. Cancer epidemiology, prevention and control. Curr Sci 2004; 86 (4): 518-27.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pindborg JJ, Mehta FS, Gupta PC, Daftary DK, Smith CJ. Reverse smoking in Andhra Pradesh, India: a study of palatal lesions among 10,169 villagers. Br J Cancer 1971; 25 (1): 10-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Franceschi S, Bidoli E, Herrero R, Muñoz N. Comparison of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx worldwide: etiological clues. Oral Oncol 2000; 36 (1): 106-15.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Shenoi R, Devrukhkar V, Chaudhuri, Sharma BK, Sapre SB, Chikhale A. Demographic and clinical profile of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective study. Indian J Cancer 2012; 49 (1): 21-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Iype EM, Pandey M, Mathew A, Thomas G, Sebastian P, Nair MK. Oral cancer among patients under the age of 35 years. J Postgrad Med 2001; 47 (3): 171-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mesquita JA, Cavalvanti AL, Nonaka CF, Godoy GP, Alves PM. Clinical and histopathological evidence of oral squamous cell carcinoma in young patients: systematized review. J Bras Patol Med Lab 2014; 50 (1): 67-74.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Falaki F, Dalirsani Z, Pakfetrat A, Falaki A, Saghravanian N, Nosratzehi T, Pazouki M. Clinical and histopathological analysis of oral squamous cell carcinoma of young patients in Mashhad, Iran: a retrospective study and review of literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011; 16 (4): e473-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Al-Rawi NH, Talabani NG. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a case series analysis of clinical presentation and histological grading of 1,425 cases from Iraq. Clin Oral Investig 2008; 12 (1): 15-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mack TM. The new pan-Asian paan problem. Lancet 2001; 357 (9269): 1638-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Merchant A, Husain SS, Hosain M, Fikree FF, Pitiphat W, Siddiqui AR, Hayder SJ, Haider SM, Ikram M, Chuang SK, Saeed SA. Paan without tobacco: an independent risk factor for oral cancer. Int J Cancer 2000; 86 (1): 128-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Krishna Rao SV, Mejia G, Roberts-Thomson K, Logan R. Epidemiology of oral cancer in Asia in the past decade - An update (2000-2012). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14: 5567-77.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rahman M, Sakamoto J, Fukui T. Bidi smoking and oral cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2003; 106 (4): 600-4.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lin WJ, Jiang RS, Wu SH, Chen FJ, Liu SA. Smoking, alcohol, and betel quid and oral cancer: a prospective cohort study. J Oncol 2011; 2011: 525976.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Fang QG, Shi S, Li ZN, Zhang X, Liua FY, Xu ZF, Sun CF. Squamous cell carcinoma of the buccal mucosa: analysis of clinical presentation, outcome and prognostic factors. Mol Clin Oncol 2013; 1 (3): 531-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Fang KH, Kao HK, Cheng MH, Chang YL, Tsang NM, Huang YC, Lee LY, Yu JS, Hao SP, Chang KP. Histological differentiation of primary oral squamous cell carcinomas in an area of betel quid chewing prevalence. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 141 (6): 743-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chen JY, Hung CC, Huang KL, Chen YT, Liu SY, Chiang WF, Chen HR, Yen CY, Wu YJ, Ko JY, Jou YS. Src family kinases mediate betel quid-induced oral cancer cell motility and could be a biomarker for early invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Neoplasia 2008; 10 (12): 1393-401.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Muange P, Chindia M, Njiru W, Dimba E, Mutave R. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: a 6-month clinico-histopathologic audit in a Kenyan population. Open J Stomatol 2014; 4 (10): 475-83.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Adel M, Kao HK, Hsu CL, Huang JJ, Lee LY, Huang Y, Browne T, Tsang NM, Chang YL, Chang KP. Evaluation of lymphatic and vascular invasion in relation to clinicopathological factors and treatment outcome in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015; 94 (43): e1510.  Back to cited text no. 24
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Assessment of Histopathological Grade and Ki-67 Expression in Tobacco and Non-tobacco Habitual Buccal Mucosa Cancer
Ramasamy Padma,Sivapatham Sundaresan,Amitkumar Kalaivani,Ramamurthy Thilagavathi
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3093    
    Printed81    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded506    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]